false
OasisLMS
Login
Catalog
Kidney Week 2025 Early Program - Advances in Resea ...
Applications of AI in Event Adjudication
Applications of AI in Event Adjudication
Back to course
[Please upgrade your browser to play this video content]
Video Transcription
Video Summary
The talk discusses how AI, especially large language models (LLMs), could streamline clinical trial event adjudication—one of the slowest, most expensive, and least transparent trial tasks. Central clinical event committees (CECs) review lengthy site-submitted “dossiers” to decide whether events meet endpoint criteria, but this process is slow, costly, variable across reviewers, and often lacks clear reasoning documentation. <br /><br />Bhadrushi’s team developed AI adjudication systems trained on thousands of CEC-labeled cases. In validation on the DELIVER heart failure trial, AI agreed with CEC decisions 83% overall, and 96% when the model was confident; using a “human-in-the-loop” approach could reduce manual review by ~84% without changing treatment effect estimates. Similar results were shown for major adverse cardiovascular events, with strongest performance in confident subsets, though numeric lab extraction (e.g., troponin types/values) remained challenging. <br /><br />AI also extracted 51 structured variables from unstructured dossiers with ~96% accuracy, enabling secondary analyses and prognostic insights. Risks include generalizability, bias (e.g., handwritten/scanned/translated records), privacy, and reduced human oversight; mitigation requires diverse validation, bias checks, privacy safeguards, and regulatory pathways.
Asset Subtitle
Samarra Badrouchi
Meta Tag
Module
ARC
Speaker
Samarra Badrouchi
Keywords
clinical trial event adjudication
large language models (LLMs)
central clinical event committees (CEC)
human-in-the-loop adjudication
major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE)
structured data extraction from clinical dossiers
×
Please select your language
1
English